<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="WordPress/2.9.2" -->
<rss version="0.92">
<channel>
	<title>Presumably Correct</title>
	<link>http://www.presumablycorrect.com/blog</link>
	<description>Ostensibly mathematical</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 08:39:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss092</docs>
	<language>en</language>
	
	<item>
		<title>Anti-Inductive Logic</title>
		<description><![CDATA[As part of my continuing interest in logic, here&#8217;s a rather curious result.
Some of you are probably familiar with so-called &#8220;inductive logic&#8221;, which is usually framed more or less as something like:
If something is true for the first n instances, then it is true for the n+1 th instance.
Now, such a rule cannot be part [...]]]></description>
		<link>http://www.presumablycorrect.com/blog/2009/07/anti-inductive-logic/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Ants</title>
		<description><![CDATA[Some of you might know of my continuing defense against ant invaders.
Now, at least the ants around here are relatively friendly, but for their sake, it&#8217;s better if they stay outside in the sunny Southern California weather. Nevertheless, they rather enjoy the indoor life: the shade, the water, and the sleeping late in bed.
Sure enough, [...]]]></description>
		<link>http://www.presumablycorrect.com/blog/2009/07/ants/</link>
			</item>
</channel>
</rss>

